Posts

When Stickers Stop Working: What I've Learned About Classroom Incentives

As teachers, we've all been there—the token board that worked beautifully in September has lost its magic by November. So what gives? After digging into the research, I've learned that the issue usually isn't the concept of incentives—it's the execution. Effective incentive programs require immediate and consistent reinforcement, rewards that actually matter to each individual student, and most importantly, a plan for fading out the system over time. One thing that really stuck with me: if we use rewards for activities students already enjoy, we can actually undermine their natural motivation. That means saving our token systems for the harder stuff—the behaviors students genuinely need support to develop. The goal isn't compliance through stickers. It's building skills that last. References Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic reward...

Making It Personal: Why Individualized Behavior Plans Matter

If there's one thing I've learned this week, it's that when it comes to behavior, one size definitely does not fit all. I've been working on designing behavioral intervention plans for three students with very different challenges, and the experience really drove home how important it is to match our strategies to what each child actually needs. Think about it this way: if a student doesn't know how to follow directions—they've never been explicitly taught the steps—giving them a sticker every time they comply won't solve the problem. They need instruction first. But another student might know exactly what's expected and just needs a little extra motivation to stay consistent. That's where reinforcement strategies shine. The research backs this up, too. Studies show that when we take time to understand whether a behavior problem comes from a skill deficit or a performance deficit, we can choose interventions that actually work (Epstein et al., 2008)...

Why Do They Do That? Understanding the 'Why' Behind Challenging Behaviors

Last week, I shared how schools use RtI2 as a safety net for students. This week, let's dig deeper into something that changed my teaching: understanding why students misbehave. I used to think Marcus was just being defiant during math. He'd crumple his papers, refuse to start, and sometimes leave the room. But when I asked the right questions, I realized he wasn't being difficult—he genuinely couldn't do multi-digit multiplication. His behavior was escape, pure and simple. Here's the truth: every behavior serves a purpose. Students might act out to avoid hard tasks, gain attention, access something they want, or because the behavior itself feels good. Sometimes, it's even our classroom setup causing the problem—I learned my 5:1 praise-to-correction ratio was way off! The game-changer? Asking "why" before jumping to consequences. Is it a "can't do" (skill deficit) or "won't do" (motivation) problem? The distinction matters b...

Challenging Behaviors

Have you ever wondered how schools decide which students need extra help? It's not as simple as waiting for a child to fail. Today's schools use Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI2)—think of it as a safety net with different layers. Imagine a three-tiered system. The bottom layer (Tier 1) supports everyone through high-quality teaching and clear expectations. The middle layer (Tier 2) provides targeted support like small group instruction or mentoring for students who need extra help. The top layer (Tier 3) offers intensive, personalized support, including specialized assessments and individualized plans. What makes RtI2 powerful is that it's based on data, not guesswork. Schools regularly check how students are doing and adjust support accordingly. When something isn't working, they dig deeper to understand why through a process called functional assessment—essentially asking, "What's really going on here?" The answers guide what happens next...